Lansing, Mich. (WLNS) — The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and university researchers have subjected a high-tech material to trial by fire and ice in their search for better bridge components.
Steel has historically been the default material for reinforcing and pre-tensioning concrete for highway bridges. Steel adds strength, but it is vulnerable to corrosion and deterioration under assault from extreme temperatures, water and deicing chemicals. Preventing corrosion and repairing damaged areas require maintenance time and resources.
MDOT and Lawrence Technological University (Lawrence Tech) in Southfield have pioneered an alternative to steel in critical bridge applications: using carbon fiber components. Carbon fiber strands have a tensile strength comparable to steel, but they resist corrosion and require less maintenance over time.
Under the direction of Dr. Nabil Grace, dean of the College of Engineering at Lawrence Tech, the school’s Center for Innovative Materials has been researching carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) since 1988, funded through multiple research awards from the National Science Foundation and MDOT.”In 2001, Lawrence Tech, MDOT and the City of Southfield worked together on the deployment of the
“CFRP has performed well in the field but its long-term durability wasn’t fully understood,” said Matthew Chynoweth, MDOT chief bridge engineer and director of MDOT’s Bureau of Bridges and Structures.
Carbon fiber components lacked a track record in transportation infrastructure. Also, engineers lacked the technical specs they needed to optimize the CFRP design process and encourage more widespread use of the material. So, beginning in 2013, MDOT again collaborated with Lawrence Tech, this time to test the short- and long-term performance of CFRP strands and beams under a wide range of conditions.
During four years of extensive research, carbon fiber components were subjected to 300 freeze-thaw cycles, combined fire/loading events, severe weather, and other trials. Now, bridge designers have the information and specifications they need to predict how CFRP will perform under a variety of real-world conditions, as well as the design tools for future bridge projects.
“This research allowed us to test every question we had about CFRP and get good data so that we can continue to design bridges that are as safe and durable as normal steel bridges but without steel’s corrosive limitations,” Chynoweth said.
The data from this research confirm what proponents of CFRP have long theorized. Investigators found that CFRP strands held up well to conditions that simulated Michigan’s harsh weather. Moisture, rain, freezing rain, and extreme temperature swings did not significantly affect the material’s strength or mechanical properties over time. In addition, test results showed that some currently accepted parameters for CFRP are conservative and can be updated.
The research generated criteria, guidelines, and recommendations to make MDOT’s design and construction of highway bridges using CFRP components more efficient. Additionally, researchers prepared design examples, valuable reference tools for bridge designers.
Practical applications are expanding, as well. Backed by previously unavailable real-world data for CFRP, engineers are making use of the material. Since the first carbon fiber components were used in 2001, more than a dozen bridges have been built throughout the state using CFRP pre-stressing and post-tensioning. Some recent examples include the southbound I-75 span over the Sexton-Kilfoil Drain in Detroit, incorporating the longest CFRP pre-stressed beams, at 140 feet; and two bridges being built as part of MDOT’s I-94 modernization project, also in Detroit.
What’s the future outlook for carbon fiber in MDOT bridge design? One barrier to wider adoption is the cost of materials.
“Cost is always an issue. That is why we only do a few bridges per year,” Chynoweth said. “However, one of our main suppliers, Tokyo Rope, built a fabrication facility in Michigan, which has cut down on some costs and delivery times for CFRP.”